Sources on Geoblocking

Court Documents

1/6/2021

United States

In re Facebook, Inc. Internet Tracking Litigation (9th Cir. 2020) (here)
In re Google Location History Litigation (NDCA 2019) (here)
Spanski Enterprises, Inc. v. Telewizja Polska, S.A., 883 F.3d 904, 915-916 (DC Cir. 2018) (here)
Plixer Intl. v. Scrutinizer GmbH, 905 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2018) (here)
Carsey-Werner Company, LLC v. BBC, CDCA, 2:17-cv-08041-PA-AS, Feb. 23, 2018
In re iPhone Application Litig., 844 F.Supp.2d 1040 (NDCA 2012) (here)
United States v. InMobi Pte Ltd., U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, case No. 3:16-cv-03474, Stipulated Order for Permanent Injunction and Civil Penalty Judgment, June 22, 2016 (here)
Triple Up Limited v. Youku Tudou Inc., U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, Case No. 1:16-cv-00159-RDM, memorandum opinion, docket document 15, January 24, 2017 (here)
Marketa Trimble, D.C. Circuit Makes Geoblocking De Facto Mandatory for Copyright Law Purposes–Spanski v. TV Polska, 2018 (here)
Yahoo!, Inc. v. La Ligue Contre Le Racisme et L‘Antisemitisme, 433 F.3d 1199 (9th Cir. 2006) (Ben Laurie’s expert opinion)
Declaration of Bennet Laurie in Lieu of Direct Testimony at 12, Nitke v. Ashcroft, 253 F. Supp. 2d 587 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) (No. 01 Civ. 11476)
Jazette Enterprises Ltd. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 2014 WL 689044, February 21, 2014 (here)

Canada

Equustek Solutions Inc. v. Google Inc., Court of Appeal for British Columbia, [2014] BCCA 295, July 23, 2014; Equustek Solutions Inc. v. Google Inc., [2015] BCCA 265, June 11, 2015 (here)
Equustek Solutions Inc. v. Google Inc., Supreme Court of Canada, 2017 SCC 34 (here)
Equustek Solutions Inc. v. Jack, Supreme Court of British Columbia, 2018 BCSC 610 (here)

European Union

Groupe Canal+ SA v. European Commission, CJEU, C-132/19 P, December 9, 2020 (here)
Google Spain SL v. Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD), ECJ, C-131/12, May 13, 2014 (here)
Google v. CNIL, CJEU, C-507/17, Opinion by Advocate General Szpunar, January 10, 2019 (here)
Eva Glawischnig-Piesczek v. Facebook Ireland Limited, CJEU, C-18/18, Opinion by Advocate General Szpunar, June 4, 2019 (here)

Germany

OLG Naumburg, Beschluss vom 7.2.2020 – 9 W 3/19 (LG Halle)
Oberverwaltungsgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen [OVG] [Higher Administrative Court] July 2, 2010, BECK-ONLINE DATENBANK [BECKRS] 50510 (Ger.)
Oberverwaltungsgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen [OVG] [Higher Administrative Court] July 13, 2010, BECK-ONLINE DATENBANK [BECKRS] 51049 (Ger.).
Oberverwaltungsgericht Lüneburg [OVG] [Higher Administrative Court] Apr. 3, 2009, BECK-ONLINE DATENBANK [BECKRS] 33166 (Ger.) (an earlier opinion by a German court concerning geolocation).
Verwaltungsgericht München [VG] [Administrative Trial Courts] Nov. 20, 2008, BECK-ONLINE DATENBANK [BECKRS] 40756 (Ger.)
Verwaltungsgericht Karlsruhe [VG] [Administrative Trial Courts] Dec. 17, 2007, BECK-ONLINE DATENBANK [BECKRS] 33500 (Ger.).

Switzerland

Bundesgericht [BGer] [Federal Supreme Court] Sept. 8, 2010, 136 ENTSCHEIDUNGEN DES SCHWEIZERISCHEN BUNDESGERICHTS [BGE] II 508 (Switz.) (IP addresses as personal data)